Editorial policy
This page explains how the content on corrplus.net is produced. Articles are published under the name Corrplus Team. First drafts of blog posts are prepared with AI assistance; every post is reviewed by our team against its sources and approved before it goes live. We list our sources, we do not invent figures, and we correct errors when they are reported.
Who writes the content?
Everything on this site is published under one name: Corrplus Team. We do not publish individual author names. The team that writes is the team that delivers the work the pages describe: AI consulting, automation, integrations and our own software products.
The Turkish and English versions of a page are written separately, each for its own reader. They cover the same subject, but one is not a word-for-word translation of the other.
How do we use AI in writing?
We use AI in drafting, and we say so. The first draft of a blog post is prepared with AI assistance, following a written brief that sets the structure, the tone and the sourcing rules.
No draft is published automatically. Each one waits for approval. A member of our team reads it, checks it against the sources it cites, corrects it where needed and approves it. A post that has not been approved does not appear on the site.
Service, solution, industry and case study pages describe our own work. They are written and reviewed by the team and state only what we can show.
How do we choose and cite sources?
Each blog post lists its sources at the end. We prefer primary sources: legislation and official gazettes, regulators, standards bodies and the documentation of the vendors whose tools we write about. A post carries at least three.
- We do not use a statistic without a source. Where we are not sure of a number, we leave it out.
- We do not invent client counts, results, ratings or quotes.
- Dates, thresholds and deadlines in regulatory topics come from the official text. These change; the post says when it was last updated.
What do we not publish?
- Invented evidence. Figures and client quotes appear only where the client has approved them. A case study without approved figures is published as a reference, not as a success story.
- Prices. Our fees depend on scope and are given in a written proposal.
- Guarantees. We do not promise results or “full compliance”.
- Legal advice. Pages on GDPR, the EU AI Act, KVKK (Türkiye’s data protection law) and tax rules are general information. Decisions belong with your legal counsel or your accountant.
When we mention Promptor, FreelancerFlow, Okey 101 Çetele or Villa Yönet, we are talking about our own products, and the page says so.
How do we keep content up to date?
Every page shows the date it was last updated. We change that date only when the content changes. Posts on regulation and on fast-moving tools are reviewed when the underlying rule or product changes, and periodically otherwise.
When we correct a factual error, we fix the text and update the date. If a correction changes the conclusion of a post, we say so in the post.
How does the assistant on this site work?
The assistant on the home page answers from the pages of this site and points to the page it used. It does not replace a conversation with our team, and it can be wrong. If its answer and a page disagree, the page is the reference.
Can AI systems read and cite this site?
Yes. Search engines and AI assistants may read, quote and cite our pages. Content pages are also available as plain Markdown for that purpose, and the site publishes an llms.txt summary.
How do you report an error?
Write to contact@corrplus.net with the address of the page and what you believe is wrong, with a source if you have one. We read every report and correct what is wrong.